搜寻结果

Sylviane Granger"s downloadable book The BE+PAST PARTICIPLE CONSTRUCTION in spoken English, with special emphasis on the passive http://www.fltr.ucl.ac.be/FLTR/GERM/ETAN/CECL/Downloads/Granger%201983%20passive.pdf

回复：The English get-passive in spoken discourse Here is Sylviane Granger's book on the BE+PAST PARTICIPLE construction. Nearly 400 pages! 哇噻! 点击这里 http://www.fltr.ucl.ac.be/FLTR/GERM/ETAN/CECL/Downloads/Granger%201983%20passive.pdf

回复：Phraseology of the core words of English This paper is worth reading...............

Download this paper. It gives a detailed introduction to POS tagging. http://forum.corpus4u.org/upload/forum/2005091913553573.pdf [本贴已被 作者 于 2005年09月19日 13时56分05秒 编辑过]

回复：Analyzing textual coherence It is okay.

TTR has been criticised a lot for its sensitivity to text length, and Malvern and Richards have proposed a different measure, which is much less sensitive to text length. Their tool is available at http://www.swan.ac.uk/cals/calsres/lognostics.htm Related literature: Durán, P., Malvern, D...

Granger's most cited papers are included in her 1998 book and 2002 book.

As long as you do not compare the content (which can be a bit difficult), these two corpora seem comparable.

It depends, but most of the time things are fine.

Corder's classical work on error analysis: http://www.corpus4u.com/upload/forum/2005091710424667.rar

Normally about 6.7% in large corpora.

An interesting online tool for analyzing textual coherence! Registration is free! http://141.225.14.26/cohmetrixR1/login.aspx

回复：[求助]lexical density tools needed And here is Paul Nation's wonderful vocabulary tool: http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/RANGE32.zip

回复：[求助]lexical density tools needed There are several vocabulary tools that can be downloaded here: http://www.swan.ac.uk/cals/calsres/lognostics.htm They may measure lexical depth, lexical richness, etc.

回复：About Error in Speech And look this way: Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24:205-214. (This was published even before Corder's 1981 book, though a few years later than Corder's 1967 book) And here is Tono's rather weak argument: In 1970s and early...

回复：About Error in Speech Thanks, xujiajin! That is the paper!

我能打开呀！

This book is probably the greatest work on error analysis. My point is that error analysis may put yourself into trouble, so you'd better include something else if you insist on carrying out an error analysis.

回复：口语错误分析Error analysis in L2 learners" Eng Speech Of course, the study involved a lot of manual annotation.

More studies done with SECCL And here are some more studies done with SECCL: http://www.corpus4u.org/upload/forum/2005091823163897.rar