搜寻结果

回复: 浮现语法(Emergent Grammar) 与构式语法(Construction Grammar)的区别与联系 In EG, constructions can be "words, phrases and small sets" (Hopper, 1987), such as gonna, I'm, you take. In CxG, 构式包括“复句到词素的不同单位”，如 ing, Him a doctor, What's X doing Y, etc. In EG, a linguistic sign is " defined as a unit that...

首先，两者都谈construction,但他们的所指一样吗？ 其次，两者都注重语境的作用；具体而言，有什么区别和联系吗？ 在国内CNKI等搜索过相关文章，好像不太多见，尤其是EG. 两语法在国内外的研究现状如何？ 谢谢！

回复: [推荐]Biber: Grammatical marking of stance Downloaded. Thanks.

In Bachman (1990), pragmatic competence parallels with organizational competence. In Kasper and Rose (1999), "discourse sequencing and conversational management" is one of the the main topics investigated in pragmatic studies. Leech (1983) states that Halliday's interpersonal and textual...

回复: 五本教育研究方面的新电子书免费下载 downloaded. thanks!

In Linear Unit Grammar, Sinclair & Mauranen (2006) distinguish two kinds of chunks: Os & Ts. Os are chunks for discourse organizing and Ts are for text incrementing. Their methods of identification of the two kinds of chunks are intuition plus discourse analysis. The Os respond to "discourse...

回复: asking for "Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society 1 Yeah I've got it via google. Thanks a lot. Where can I find the 1998 one? Do you have it?:D

回复: asking for "Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society 1 Do you have it? ;) Thanks a lot.

Dr Xu, do you have the paper? Thanks.

回复: asking for "McCarthy, M.J. and Carter, R.A. (2002) 'This, that and the other" Thank you again, Dr Xu, for being so generous by sharing with us your unfinished paper. I always wonder how you could have read and known so much? :confused: thanks!

回复: asking for "McCarthy, M.J. and Carter, R.A. (2002) 'This, that and the other" I've read your article. A very good one, giving me lots of inspirations. Partly because of the rise of corpus linguistics, multi-word chunks are receiving more and more attention. Emergency theory may account for...

Such chunks are frequent and a natural phenomenon in conversations. What makes them so frequent then? Could their pragmatic functions be one reason?

McCarthy, M.J. and Carter, R.A. (2002) 'This, that and the other. Multi-word clusters in spoken English as visible patterns of interaction', TEANGA (2002) (Yearbook of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics) 21: 30-52 Does anyone has it and could share it with us? Dr Xiaoz, do you...

回复: functions of er/erm etc Thanks again, Dr Xu.

回复: functions of er/erm etc Thank you, Dr Xu, for being so helpful and patient all the time. Right, I'm gonna look for some references. Yet, could you offer any, if they are already available to you?:p Again many thanks.

It is generally agreed that they function as pause fillers, yet do they function as hedges as well, as in the following examples? er I don't knower I think I'mer I think soerm I don't knowerm I think Ierm I think iterm I think it'serm I think the In the above examples, er/erm are followed by...

回复: 说话人的主观性(subjectivity)和立场(stance)属于语用范畴么 thanks a lot!

回复: 说话人的主观性(subjectivity)和立场(stance)属于语用范畴么 如果是属语用的话,那学生对个人情感,对人事的态度,评估的(英语)表达反映出语用特征? thanks again!

Biber, et al, 1999, Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English中将stance markers分为三种: 1. epistemic; 2. attitudinal; 3. style of speaking 发现很多对语用标记语(pragmatic/discourse markers)的功能分析描述时有如以下功能: conveying speaker's emotions, assessment, evaluation of or commnet on the propositions...

回复: Two reviews in memory of Sinclair Downloaded them. Thanks a lot!